Law Alert

April 17, 2024

On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis Missouri. In this case, a female police officer was involuntarily transferred and replaced with a male police officer. Her rank and pay stayed the same, but her job responsibilities, certain job perks, and schedule did not. She brought a lawsuit claiming discrimination based on sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees and prohibits covered employers from discriminating against employees in the terms and conditions of their employment based on their race, color, religion, national origin, or sex. 

The question that the Supreme Court answered in this case is whether a job transfer needs to have “significantly” harmed an employee in order for the employer to have violated Title VII. The Court found that it does not. The law prevents employers from treating employees worse because of a protected characteristic—it does not matter how badly the employee is harmed if a disadvantage occurs due to an involuntary job transfer. 

Muldrow v. City of St. Louis Missouri

Stop worrying about labor laws, and let Thread take the administrative work out of HR. Let us know how we can help!

Recommended For You

HR Q&A | How can we help our employees feel more comfortable providing feedback about their managers? HR Q&As Human Resources

HR Q&A | How can we help our employees feel more comfortable providing feedback about their managers?

HR Pros at HR Support Center October 16, 2024
HR Q&A | What Location Do I Use for Employee Pay? HR Q&As Human Resources

HR Q&A | What Location Do I Use for Employee Pay?

HR Pros at HR Support Center October 15, 2024
Minimum Wage Table Payroll

Minimum Wage Table

HR Pros at HR Support Center October 14, 2024