There’s no rule against having multiple employee handbooks, but there are some factors to consider. Having multiple versions would lead to more administrative work to ensure all handbooks are up-to-date and consistent. If you have separate handbooks for exempt and nonexempt employees or for employees in different states, each handbook would need to be updated any time your policies or practices change. This extra work would increase the likelihood of omissions or errors, potentially causing confusion for employees and managers alike. One alternative to having two separate handbooks would be to add an appendix that provides relevant information specific to exempt and nonexempt employees.
The approach we most often recommend is to ensure that you are clear within each policy about who it applies to. For instance, you might want all employees to track their time, but only need nonexempt employees to track their breaks—you can simply point this out in your singular timekeeping policy. Or you might have two different vacation accrual systems. If they are vastly different, you could have two different policies side by side, whereas if they are mostly the same, you can just call out the differences that apply to certain employee types. By doing it this way, the core of the handbook is the same for everyone, and there’s no need to update multiple handbooks when something that affects everyone changes.
This Q&A does not constitute legal advice and does not address state or local law.
Do you need help updating, creating, or auditing your handbook(s)? Contact our team today!